Some people argue that genetic engineering could eliminate current diseases and disorders, thus creating a more perfect society. To live in a disease-free world could be much easier, but the steps taken to attain this could be more destructive than the diseases themselves. If genetic engineering was successful and every new human was born without imperfections, what would happen to the desire for overachievement? Scientists and doctors are using genetic engineering as a way to eliminate disease, although their methods are questionable at best. They bring the eggs and sperm together in a laboratory dish until it consists of about eight cells. One cell is then removed and tested for any disease-linked genes. If the cell is a carrier it is discarded.[1] Curing genetic diseases may seem like the ultimate solution to many problems, but is everything really meant to be “perfect”? Although overcoming disease and disability is a great challenge, the strength gained from such accomplishment sparks inspiration to overcome barriers. In our history, the people who we have rendered heroes and role models are those who have overcome trying obstacles to achieve their goals. Also, by eliminating those with disease, we are basically saying that they live less fulfilling, less valuable lives than the rest. Unless we have walked in another’s shoes, who are we to judge? It is possible that because of their circumstances they have learned to value their lives even more and make the most of their situation. It is unfair to say that one life is less significant than another.
Photo taken from: http://www.public-domain-image.com/science-public-domain-images-pictures/science-laboratory-work.jpg.html
[1] Moore, Pete. The Debate About Genetic Engineering. New York: Rosen Pub., 2008. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment